EdgeTheory is pleased to announce that Colonel John Wilcox has joined EdgeTheory through the U.S. Department of Defense SkillBridge program as an industry intern.

Signals of the Strait of Hormuz closure were visible in the information environment weeks before the disruption reached Western headlines — or any supply chain risk dashboard.

By the time most organizations recognized the crisis, the narrative driving it had already formed, spread, and begun moving markets. Insurance premiums were rising. Shipping routes were being reconsidered. Commodity traders were already pricing in uncertainty.

This report examines how Iranian state messaging around the Strait of Hormuz functions as a measurable precursor to supply chain disruption — and what those signals looked like before the crisis became a crisis.

It covers the four narrative themes Iran deployed to shape global perceptions of the Strait, how that messaging amplified through state media, social networks, and Western outlets, and what supply chain risk teams can monitor to detect similar escalation patterns earlier.

The window to act proactively is always open before the narrative matures. This report shows what it looks like before it closes.

Most supply chain risk tools monitor physical disruptions after they're reported. Narrative intelligence detects the signals forming days earlier. Here's what that gap actually looks like.

This report examines the coordinated Russian Matryoshka bot network malign influence campaign of February 2026. It combines cross-platform narrative analysis, network amplification mapping, and visual-content forensics.

Russian information operations increasingly rely on AI and leverage large networks of inauthentic social media accounts, synthetic media, and coordinated cross-platform amplification. High-profile scandals - such as the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein—are frequently repurposed to discredit Western political leaders.

The Matryoshka operation demonstrates the growing sophistication of Russian influence operations. These campaigns integrate bot networks, fabricated media artifacts, and synchronized cross-platform dissemination, using emotionally charged scandals to support geopolitical messaging.

The Narrative Escalation of a Healthcare Ransomware Breach examines how a technical cybersecurity vulnerability evolved into a full-scale institutional crisis narrative.

The report analyzes the exploitation of a critical flaw in BeyondTrust remote-access software and the resulting ransomware incident affecting the University of Mississippi Medical Center.

The case illustrates how modern cyber incidents unfold across two distinct narrative tracks. The first emerges within specialized cybersecurity communities as vulnerabilities are disclosed, exploitation risks are analyzed, and patch advisories circulate among security professionals. The second begins once operational disruption becomes public, shifting coverage toward institutional impact, healthcare service interruptions, and broader concerns about cybersecurity resilience.

Together, these narratives demonstrate how vulnerability disclosures can rapidly escalate into operational, reputational, and strategic challenges for organizations in critical sectors such as healthcare.

This report analyzes how Iraq became an active front in the US Israeli war with Iran after US forces struck Iran backed militia Kata’ib Hezbollah on 28 February. The strike prompted retaliatory attacks while Iraq’s political parties remain unable to form a government.

EdgeTheory’s narrative intelligence detects escalation signals and rising narrative volume tied to militia retaliation and regional reactions following the strikes on Iran.

These indicators point to deepening instability that could further destabilize Iraq’s Shi’a dominated political system.

This report analyzes the 3 January 2024 bombing in Kerman as both a mass-casualty attack and a catalytic information event. It integrates geospatial indicators, narrative attribution patterns, and cross-platform information flows to assess how competing actors shaped and contested meaning in the aftermath across regional and transnational audiences.

On 3 January 2024, twin bombings near the grave of Qasem Soleimani in Kerman killed more than 90 people during a mass commemoration ceremony marking the fourth anniversary of his death in a U.S. drone strike. The attack was later claimed by Islamic State-Khorasan Province (ISIS-K), triggering an immediate information contest over attribution and strategic meaning.

The event illustrates how violent incidents function as both operational acts and narrative inflection points. ISIS-K framed the bombing as a sectarian strike against a Shi’a ritual gathering, while Iranian authorities embedded the event within their “axis of resistance” narrative and broader confrontation with Israel and the United States.

This EdgeTheory Narrative Insight report examines how political legitimacy was contested in real time following the February 28, 2026 U.S.–Israeli strike that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader and senior IRGC officials.

Drawing on cross-platform collection—including Telegram, X, state-aligned media, diaspora networks, and diplomatic channels—the report tracks how narratives fragmented within minutes of the strike. Competing frames quickly took shape: martyrdom and resistance, regime decapitation, escalation warnings, sovereignty violations, and doubt about the reported death.

The analysis details how AI-generated imagery, recycled combat footage, religious symbolism, and coordinated state messaging accelerated distrust and conflict-aversion narratives—often shaping perception before verification cycles stabilized.

The event illustrates how modern military operations now unfold simultaneously across kinetic and informational domains, where legitimacy is contested in real time.

This EdgeTheory Narrative Intelligence report examines how the nomination of Nouri Al-Maliki for a third term is reshaping Iraq’s information environment — and what that reveals about Iranian influence, sectarian risk, and U.S. strategic exposure.

Drawing on narrative volume tracking, emotional language analysis, and amplification mapping across Iraqi, Kurdish, militia-affiliated, and international sources, the report identifies spikes in anger-laden and instability-focused narratives following the announcement. Coverage surrounding U.S. pressure, Kurdish political negotiations, ISIS prisoner transfers, and security transition timelines demonstrates how perception battles are unfolding alongside political maneuvering.

Rather than viewing the nomination as a routine leadership contest, the analysis shows how narrative dynamics are amplifying instability risk — potentially influencing coalition negotiations, protest mobilization, and international policy response long before a prime minister is confirmed.

This report synthesizes geospatial indicators, narrative attribution, and networked information flows related to Islamic State recruitment, propaganda dissemination, and operational signaling in the contemporary digital environment. Drawing on multi-platform collection streams—including Telegram channels, X posts, online newsletters, open-source media reporting, and extremist-affiliated publications—the analysis maps how jihadist narratives originate, adapt, and amplify across regions and audiences.