EdgeTheory Logo
Menu
close
CONTACT
EdgeTheory Logo
Menu
close
CONTACT
November 2, 2026

Advanced Persistent Threats to the US Midterm Elections: Coordinated Information Operations by China, Russia, & Iran

EdgeTheory's brief on the key issues foreign adversaries highlight and amplify regarding the 2026 midterm elections, and how they connect the wars in Ukraine and Iran to American electoral outcomes.

As the November 3, 2026, U.S. midterm elections approach, foreign actors and influence networks are amplifying narratives connecting American domestic political instability to ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Iran. Chinese, Russian, and Iranian sources have increasingly emphasized economic dissatisfaction, election interference, declining institutional credibility, and the political consequences of U.S. military engagement. While their messaging differs in emphasis, these narratives collectively portray American foreign policy as economically unsustainable, politically motivated, and increasingly unpopular among U.S. voters.

What You'll Learn

  • Foreign adversaries are increasingly exploiting the timing of U.S. military decisions to undermine electoral legitimacy before results are determined.
  • Iranian influence messaging is converting the economic consequences of military conflict into direct electoral pressure.
  • Foreign influence narratives are increasingly structured to undermine confidence in U.S. institutions regardless of which political party benefits.
  • Chinese state-aligned sources are reinforcing overlapping narratives portraying the November 2026 midterm elections as evidence of U.S. economic decline, political instability, and institutional dysfunction.
  • Russian-aligned sources are exploiting the midterm elections to amplify perceptions of U.S. institutional dysfunction, military overextension, and declining democratic legitimacy.
  • Iranian state-aligned sources are conducting a sustained narrative campaign linking the November midterm elections to U.S. military operations against Iran, rising economic costs, and declining public confidence in the Trump administration.

Using EdgeTheory's Narrative Intelligence capabilities, the analysis identifies recurring narratives, source amplification patterns, and potential influence tactics employed by Chinese, Russian, and Iranian state-aligned sources.

Download the report

October 29, 2026

Tehran’s Southern Flank: IRGC Enabling of Houthi Anti-Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) and Turkish Strategic Posturing

This assessment examines the evolving Yemeni conflict by identifying external support networks, distinguishing verified developments from contested claims, and assessing the strategic motivations behind emerging regional security partnerships.

The escalating conflict in Yemen is reshaping regional security as Iranian-backed Houthi forces continue to threaten Saudi Arabia, critical energy infrastructure, and maritime shipping through the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Iran's military and technical support has strengthened Houthi missile, drone, and surveillance capabilities, while renewed hostilities have exposed vulnerabilities in Saudi Arabia's defenses.

What You'll Learn

  • Iranian support may be evolving from weapons transfers to direct operational involvement.
  • The emerging Saudi-led coalition reflects a shift from offensive intervention toward shared regional defense.
  • Turkey's expanding security role could reduce Saudi dependence on U.S. support without displacing American influence.
  • The threat to Bab el-Mandeb is particularly significant as disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz increase Saudi dependence on Red Sea oil export routes.
  • Yemen has returned to a complex proxy war.
  • A stronger Turkish security role could complicate Iranian efforts to exploit the Yemen and Red Sea fronts as strategic leverage.

Together, these findings demonstrate how NARINT can identify emerging threats, assess strategic intent, and highlight intelligence gaps requiring further collection and verification.

Download the report

October 23, 2026

The Rise of AI Weapons Systems & Supply Chain Security

EdgeTheory's assessment of Western chips and AI weapons systems: how restricted actors acquire Western technology, how AI export controls are circumvented, and how monitoring can be strengthened.

Western semiconductors and electronic components continue to reach Russia, China, and other restricted actors despite U.S. and allied export controls. Complex global supply chains, third-country transshipment, secondary markets, and manipulated end-user documentation create opportunities for circumvention. These vulnerabilities pose growing national-security risks as Western components are identified in Russian missiles, drones, and autonomous weapons systems.

What You'll Learn

  • Western technology is reaching restricted actors primarily by exploiting the complex intermediaries of global supply chains rather than through direct purchases from Western manufacturers.
  • Russia relies heavily on third-country re-export hubs, intermediary firms, secondary markets, and commercially available dual-use components.
  • Taiwanese prosecutors allege that Nvidia B300-equipped servers were rerouted to Chinese buyers through Indonesia and Japan using forged shipping documents and a staged end-user audit.
  • For North Korea, the assessment does not establish a physical semiconductor-smuggling route, but identifies cyber-enabled methods for accessing foreign computing resources.
  • The greatest weakness in current export controls emerges after technology leaves the original exporter, creating a gap between controlling sales and controlling capabilities.
  • Effective AI export controls will increasingly depend on monitoring networks and behavior rather than restricted products alone.

EdgeTheory could support this approach as an early-warning intelligence layer by identifying emerging intermediaries, changing procurement routes, and adaptations to new controls, allowing enforcement organizations to prioritize high-risk actors and networks for further investigation.

Download the report

October 12, 2026

Iraq Postpones Disarmament, Cutting Deal with Iran-Backed Factions

A New EdgeTheory Assessment on how Iran's allies supported the effort to maintain pressure on the global energy supply from within Iraq.

Iran's allies supported the effort to maintain pressure on the global energy supply from within Iraq. Likely Iran-backed actors, whether the Houthis or Iran-backed Iraqi militias, conducted a drone attack damaging three pumping stations along Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline on 11 September, prompting the pipeline's temporary closure. Iraqi media narratives using language evoking anger and fear spiked on 12 September, a day after the East-West pipeline attack.

What You'll Learn

  • Iran's direct confrontation with US military vessels is a significant escalation and shows the importance the regime places on retaining control of the Hormuz Strait.
  • Iran directly supported the Houthi Movement's territorial gains along Yemen's Red Sea coast near the Bab Al-Mandab Strait in September, likely to compensate for diminishing influence over Hormuz.
  • The timing of the attack on the East-West pipeline, a key oil transit route that functions as an overland alternative to Hormuz, suggests it may have been coordinated to coincide with Houthi territorial gains surrounding the Bab Al-Mandab Strait.
  • Likely Iran-backed militias have conducted numerous strikes on Saudi oil infrastructure from within Iraq during the current conflict.
  • Iran is also contending with intensifying US economic pressure.

From Iran's perspective, increasing the Houthis' ability to threaten the Bab Al-Mandab allows Iran to maintain pressure on the global energy supply even as the US alleviates some of that pressure by revitalizing Hormuz Strait transit.

Download the report

October 5, 2026

The Dragon’s Cloak Exposing the Duplicity of Xi’s Summit with Trump

A New EdgeTheory Assessment on how foreign state, state-aligned, and other influential actors characterized the Trump–Xi summit, the narratives used to interpret its outcomes, and differences between foreign-facing and Chinese domestic messaging.

The Trump–Xi summit generated competing foreign narratives about its significance for U.S.–China relations and the broader international order. This brief examines how foreign state, state-aligned, and other influential actors characterized the summit, the narratives used to interpret its outcomes, and differences between foreign-facing and Chinese domestic messaging. Analysis also considers which themes generated the strongest emotional and narrative response to identify how the summit was leveraged beyond its immediate diplomatic outcomes.

What You'll Learn

  • China-aligned actors moved beyond arguing that tariffs, sanctions, and technology restrictions failed to weaken Beijing. They claimed these measures accelerated Chinese self-reliance in manufacturing, technology, supply chains, and critical minerals.
  • China-aligned actors connected the meeting to BRICS and Global South narratives depicting Western predominance as eroding. In this framing, the summit’s importance lies less in individual agreements than in its symbolic value: Washington engaging Beijing as a strategic peer becomes evidence for a wider transition toward distributed global power.
  • Fear dominated the summit’s emotional profile and peaked alongside heightened discussion of trade, Taiwan, and the risk of war on September 24, indicating that engagement was strongest when the summit was framed around its implications for future economic and security competition rather than diplomacy itself.
  • The key narrative shift is therefore from “China is stronger” to “U.S. policy helped make China stronger.”
  • Chinese official messaging directed toward domestic audiences emphasized specific deliverables and material benefits rather than the broader power-transition narratives prevalent among China-aligned foreign actors.

The Trump–Xi summit became a contested symbol of the evolving U.S.–China relationship. Taken together, the narratives suggest that the summit’s information significance derived less from what was agreed than from competing efforts to define what renewed U.S.–China engagement signifies about power, leverage, and the future international order.

Download the report

1 2 3 … 31
chevron-down